Using a literal interpretation of actus reus, no omission could constitute a crime. There are three problems with this. The principle of voluntary assumption of duty was arguably extended too far in the case of R v Taktak. The official English translation of section 13 of the German Criminal Code sets out not a duty to act, but rather a penalty for whoever fails to prevent a result which is an element of a criminal provision () if they are legally responsible for ensuring that the result does not occur and if the omission is equivalent to the [commission of] the offence through a positive act. Boston House, Maxwell 2012). ECHR, in the opinion of the author the law on omissions should be expanded to Study notes, videos, interactive activities and more! West Yorkshire, to provide a police officer with a specimen of breath when required to do so is Medical evidence was such that if the girl had received medical assistance she would not have died. Resources. If a person has a special relationship with the victim. The second instance is under contract law. Gibbins gave money to Proctor to look after his children, and claimed that he thought the child was looked after. The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE! Created by. Actus reus, in essence, means some form of criminal act. cases, such as in a parent-child relationship, such duty arises automatically. A duty to act is possible to arise through a contract, employees are in many cases contractually bound to act in certain situations. Answer: R v Gibbins & Proctor (1918) 13 cr app r 134 is reported in the court of criminal appeal in 22 April, 1918, the appeal was dismissed in 1919. Info: 1328 words (5 pages) Essay we term certain events acts or omissions may be both flexible in practice applying 2023. And it will also show some of the absurd instances in which an actus reus is said to be formed, but quite frankly, some of the situations seems very unlikely that it is criminal but none the less a conviction was made. Held: The question for the court was whether it was in the best interests of the child that she should have the operation and not whether the wishes of the parents should be respected. Christie Criminal Law (4th edn, Thomson. he omitted to move her hand), the court held it to be - in effect - an act by the man. owe patients a duty to preserve their lives by the provision of reasonable One of the proposed alternatives to this dilemma that we have seen in other jurisdictions, such as in France and Germany, is the imposition of so-called Good Samaritan laws. She contracted pneumonia and passed away after being taken to hospital for treatment. His sister came to live with them. But when the aunt took ill, the niece did nothing to look after her or help her in anyway. S had severe disabilities, being partially deaf and blind. When he woke up, he found that the mattress was on fire. In addition, before the trial opened, Attorney General for Jersey v Holley [2005] 3 WLR 29. by which a duty to act is being imposed. Case: R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) Topics Case: R v Adamako (1994) Topics Case: Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent (1983) Topics Case: Hill v Baxter (1958) Topics Legal causation Topics Factual causation Topics Result crime Topics Conduct crime Topics The positive action principle Topics State of affairs offences Topics The voluntary principle Therefore, murder had occurred. In R v Pittwood [1902] TLR 37, the accused was a gatekeeper and he failed to close the railway gate. Gibbins gave money to Proctor to look after his children, and claimed that he thought the child was looked after. If a person commits a dangerous act and fails to resolve the act. Will the courts one day impose the duty to call an ambulance on said passers-by? 25 terms. D stabbed his wife, V, who was later placed on a life support machine. However, the attempted rescue may not cause this duty to arise if upon failing the rescue they subsequently get help. Would treating omissions in the same manner as acts be inconsistent with other interests which criminal law should protect, such as principle of authority, legality, as well as the harm principle? Flashcards. impose a duty to act, a duty can also be assumed contractually or through the Terms in this set (7) R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) D's guilty of murder for failing to feed their daughter. The child died some 10 days later of dehydration and gross emaciation (i.e. Again in T.H. Held: The appeal was allowed and the convictions were quashed. Criminal Law Learn with flashcards, games, and more for free. Lord Coleridge CJ wrote that despite the lack of statute or precedent, it would be "a slur on justice" were Ds behaviour to go unpunished. absence of a duty to actif there is an act, someone acts; but if there is an While adverts are often invitations to treat, they can be offers. Simple but detailed case summaries with relevant pictures to easily memorise. Disclaimer: This essay has been written by a law student and not by our expert law writers. Facts: This case involved a mother and her expecting daughter. If there is a duty for the hospital to act, the hospital would be criminally liable for the omission. Both defendants were convicted of manslaughter as they voluntarily assumed the responsibility to care for her, which they failed to do. A contract may create a duty under criminal law to not only people party to the contract, but also, to people who are likely to be injured if the contract is not performed. This desire to issue just rulings must be carefully balanced with the fundamental legal principles of individual liberty and autonomy. In conclusion, there are many ways in which an actus reus can be reached but here are three main ways. Facts: J was born prematurely and suffered brain damage. Owned by the Proprietor and Subsequent Buyer. Facts: The defendant (D), a man of low intelligence, was alleged to have neglected his baby daughter by failing to summon medical assistance when she became ill. Three days later, when she became unconscious, D called the doctor, who did not arrive until after she died. Her parents, having decided that it would be kinder to allow her to die rather than live as a physically and mentally disabled person, refused to consent to the operation. malice aforethought . The Court of Appeal extended this principle in R v Evans,[9] where they upheld a manslaughter conviction. If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on LawTeacher.net then please: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! general duty to act. Tel: +44 0844 800 0085. However, the courts have correctly adopted a pragmatic, albeit cautious, approach to situations where a persons failure to act should be considered criminal. The author will now delve Includes stepparent; this is a continuing duty once adopted (Gibbins v Proctor, Stone and Dobinson). The prisoner, therefore, wilfully - not maliciously, but intentionally - disobeyed the law, and death ensued in consequence. School Council, Members of Staff, Magazine Committee, List of Full Course Students 1938, Full Course Commercial Students, Editorial, Personal Column, Obituary - Roy S. Hall - F. J. Martell, S.M.B Old Boys' Association, The Literary Society, Centenary Jottings, Fumes from the Lab, Broken Hill, News from Papua, Sidelights on the B.H.P. that the law on omissions should protect other important principles and the Mrs B, therefore, applied to the High Court for a declaration that she had the requisite capacity to refuse treatment. The House of Lords held You don't like reading a lot? Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Both D and his wife were convicted of murder due to D having a responsibility to his child, and the wife as she had a special relationship to the daughter. Did I help people navigate their law degrees. According to T.H. Legislative attempts to impose a duty to help others may be well-meaning, but to be effectual, they would have to be no more broad in scope than the current state of the common law. Citations: [1891] 64 LT 594; [1891] 55 JP 616. It is therefore the contention of the author Match. The Disregarding of Separate Legal Personality. We almost always perceive a moral distinction between [for example] killing a person and failing to save his life [the former being the worse]; and similarly between other acts and corresponding This essay will also examine their application in continental jurisdictions. *You can also browse our support articles here >. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. With respects to situations like this, the general duty of care seems impractical. Dressler Proctor was in charge of the child, so Gibbons made out he had no knowledge of the child's condition. [18] It is submitted that the German provision here is effectual, but no more so than the current state of the common law. differently by each person and everyone should have the freedom to act in his Upon seeing the fire, he then got up and went to another room and went back to sleep. Another instance in which an actus reus can be formed is if someone fails to uphold a duty which they have taken on voluntarily, such as in the case of R v Instan. view argues that it adopts the welfare-based proposition that society requires Omissions are also penalised when the defendant is a public servant, as these people have duties to safeguard the public and their failure to do so can have very serious consequences. She signed a form which was neither read nor explained to her, signifying her refusal of consent to blood transfusions. Flashcards. Did Bystander see the truck? It is submitted this argument is overly cautious in its unwillingness to criminalise an omission, suggesting that parents caring for infants do not have a duty to know when to call for medical help. social responsibility approach. Facts: The defendant (D) was a member of the sect known as the "Peculiar People" who believed that all resort to medical aid - as opposed to spiritual aid - to treat illness was sinful. This was because Gibbins gave Proctor money which was sufficient enough to provide for the wants of themselves and their children. Although this may be the case Gibbins was still convicted along with Proctor. For example, a number of statutes This established a common-sense precedent that a person who creates a danger is under a legal duty to alleviate the effects of that danger. Held: At the trial the judge instructed the jury that D owed a duty to his wife. The fact that death is brought about by a doctor's decision to end life support does not break the chain of causation for murder as long as the decision was made competently. his own safety [17]. It will also give examples of the type of situations in which an actus reus is said to have been formed. criminally liable for gross negligence manslaughter if he directly creates the They failed to look after her and ensure she got the medical help she needed. Sexual intercourse was complete upon penetration in the sense that it had come into existence, it was a continuing act only ending with withdrawal; that since rape is defined as "having" intercourse without consent a man was guilty of rape within the section if he continued intercourse after he realised that the woman was no longer consenting. It would seem wrong that courts have recognized relationships between spouses Smith (1979)[6], here it should be noted Facts: The Defendant (D) was the hospital caring for Ms B. Mrs B was paralysed, but was able to move her head and speak. If a parent, or stepparent acting as loco parentis fails to adequately care and provide for a child this may form the actus reus of a criminal offence where the child comes to harm, as they owe the child a duty ofcare. A case example of this type of relationship can be seen in R v Gibbins and Proctor [1918] 13 Cr App Rep 134. 'I see no rational ground for excluding from conduct capable of giving rise to criminal liability, conduct which consists of failing to take measures . Held: D was guilty of gross negligence manslaughter. To establish that a crime has been committed by omission, it is necessary to show three elements. Facts: The defendants were convicted of the murder of Gibbins's daughter Nelly, a girl of seven. D was entitled to decline to answer the questions and to accompany the police officer to the police box. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB, Taking a break or withdrawing from your course, You're seeing our new experience! The golden rule was used to avoid a repugnant . argues that to be guilty of this crime the bystander must know that another 9 terms. The defendants then hid the childs body and buried it in a brickyard in order to conceal her death. R v Ahmad (1986). Case: R v Holland (1841) . Dressler Test. Christie, they say that an omission is only applicable if someone has failed to act where there was a legal duty to act. Facts: The defendant (D) lived with her aunt, who was suddenly taken ill with gangrene in her leg and became unable either to feed herself or to call for help. Whilst it was widely accepted that the father (D) was obligated to look after his own child, the man's common law partner was also considered liable because, although the child was not her own, she had received money for food from the man (which could have been used to feed the child). Match. Summary of all you need to know from textbooks, court judgments and journal articles in few pages. Miller had created a duty to act by creating a dangerous situation. It was found that the defendant had assumed a duty of care for her as, by bringing her to the dealers home, there was no chance of anyone else helping her. . Held: The fact that D did nothing about it for four days amounted to handling by "dishonestly undertaking the retention of the property by or for the benefit of another. that an omission by doctors to provide life support in the best interests of a patient The author in this essay will critically discuss whether it is the correct approach for acts to have a distinct treatment than omissions. Facts: The patient - who was pregnant - had been involved in a car accident and during hospital treatment required a blood transfusion. The court upheld the conviction. danger to D, then liability should be imposed for failing to act, even where Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! punish the differing moral codes of people, moral duties are conceived Facts: Tony Bland was a young supporter of Liverpool F.C. In Hood (2004)[7], a husband was deemed to To prove a crime has been committed, it is usually necessary to prove two things. In this case, the defendants helpless daughter (aged 25) was starved due to their omission to feed her. towards helping a person in danger only if there is a duty of care it is and omission). R v Gibbins & Proctor (1918) 13 Cr App R 134, CCA D1 and his mistress D2 were convicted of the murder of D1's seven-year-old daughter Nelly; they had starved the child to death and the jury found this to have been their intention (though P, who hated Nelly, was clearly the moving force). However, Fanny's condition deteriorated and she was found dead in her bed in appalling conditions. The outcome of this case has been criticised as there seems to be little logical basis for this conclusion. Facts: The Defendant (D) was the husband of a woman who gave birth to a stillborn child at home. Negative) about Bad Samaritan Laws [2000] Santa Clara Law Review 971, R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) 13 Cr App R 134. [10] Airedale NHS Trust v Bland (1993) AC 789. How do Perhaps the most obvious of these is when there is a familial relationship between parties. She was poorly cared for and developed infected bedsores as a result of her condition. At first glance it would appear the actus reus and mens rea are not present at the same time, and therefore the D is innocent. Key point Acceptance can be made without knowledge of the offer (but this is doubtful) Facts A reward of 25 was offered for information leading to the arrest of a criminal The advertisement stipulated that the information must be given to the Superintendent A police officer asked a colleague to forward some useful information to the . Learn more, Uk government blocks Scottish Gender reform bill, When do you need to apply uni before A level result day or after, ***Official Investment Banking 2023 Summer Internship Thread***, Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2023 Thread, [Official Thread] Russian invasion of Ukraine. In R v Miller,[8] the House of Lords found the defendant guilty of arson by omission. This conviction seems again slightly strange as although the accused didnt actually do anything, she was still held liable as she was failed to help the old woman and didnt give her anything to help her live through the illness and also failed to seek out medical help for the aunt. In R v Gibbins and Proctor (1918) 13 Cr App R 134, . There have been a few cases in which an actus reus is said to have been formed but upon closer examination, they have been deemed ridiculous accusations. Where there is the duty to act, failure to do so can lead to liability even for murder if the necessary mens rea is present. He awoke and saw that the cigarette had started a small fire. Held: It was held that D had evaded a liability by deception (Theft Act 1978, s.2). For constructive manslaughter there must be an unlawful 'act; the offence could not be committed by an omission. If you are looking for a more detailed explanation of liability for omissions, we suggest that you also take a look at Law Answered, who have produced LLB and GDL guides to Criminal Law. S was a 24 year old in a Persistant Vegetative State following a drug overdose. In that case Shaw J distinguished . However, there is a counter argument that people could cause more harm if trying to help an injured person. Thus, D failed to call a doctor for his sick child and instead relied on the power of prayer. Boston Spa, We created simple notes with exam tips, case summaries, sample essays, tutorial videos, quizzes and flashcards all specifically designed for you to get a First Class in the simplest way possible. First and 2.1 Class answers to learn structuring problem and essay questions. since the passing of the Human Rights Act 1998 the courts need to take this VAT reg no 816865400. In addition, before the trial opened, application was made on behalf of both prisoners that they should be tried separately. Held: D was not guilty. This essay aims to critically analyse the place of omissions within the criminal law, which traditionally has primarily focused on acts of commission which result in harm to another. Practice all cards Practice all cards Practice all cards done loading. Successful applicants will receive one-on-one coaching and advice throughout the year from their mentor and will be invited to exclusive networking events and skills workshops. regardless of whether they are on duty at the time of the incident or not, as The Student Room and The Uni Guide are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd. Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. R v Gibbons and Proctor (1918) 13 Cr App Rep 134. D was to put this money into his bank account for safe keeping. Help center. Held: The appeal was allowed. Significant Constitutional Principles in the UK. Company registration No: 12373336. Perhaps the most unclear criminalisation of omissions comes in the form of voluntary assumptions of duty. It was incorrect for the judge to extend the duty to cohabitees; the duty is restricted to blood relationships He had been in this state for three years and was being kept alive on life support machines. ECHR guarantees the Right to Life; imposing a positive obligation to Member She had mental problems and was suffering from anorexia nervosa. Flashcards. The Professional Teacher; Courses & Events CPD courses & events. cover omissions even when there is no duty of care, however liability should Within the actus reus, there must be both a voluntary act and a consequent result. own will without being limited by the fear of liability. Williams opines that We have much stronger inhibitions against active Facts: The defendant (D) had been out drinking for the evening. caused. The appellants were convicted of murdering a seven-year-old girl in their care after they allowed her to starve to death. In forming an actus reus, there are three main things which are seen as the three main ways in which an actus reus can be formed. (6th edn, OUP 2014). Most notably, the duty of care will continue where the child, having reached the age of 18, is incapable of looking after him or herself. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Criminal Law 163, Dennis J Baker, Omissions Flashcards. Facts: In this case a police woman, before searching the Defendants pockets, asked him if he had any needles or other sharp objects on him. The evidence in this case agrees says that the evidence was less against Gibbins than Proctor. These rulings are not consistent with the emphasis put on autonomy and free will in criminal law,[10] but nonetheless, they are justified. children. The family had sufficient funds to support all residing within the house, but Nelly was deliberately starved which caused her death. The conventional view argues that there is a moral distinction between acts and omissions and liability should only be imposed in clear and serious cases, principally where a duty has been voluntarily assumed. Her child was stillborn and her condition deteriorated. The Student Room and The Uni Guide are both part of The Student Room Group. Published: 3rd Nov 2020. LS23 6AD R V Gibbins and Proctor. However there doesnt always have to be a criminal act as there is such a thing as crimes of commission due to omission. Books to read for a Law Personal Statement? One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!) Looking for a flexible role? 3. the observations of Shaw J in R v Robson, R v Harris [1972] 2 All ER 699 at 701d-g in relation to the necessity for the prosecution to show that certain tape recordings relied upon were originals. Claimed that he thought the child was looked after people, moral duties are facts. Lords held You do n't like reading a lot person in danger if. Money into his bank account for safe keeping wife, v, was! A familial relationship between parties taken to hospital for treatment Persistant Vegetative State following a drug overdose blood.! ; events CPD Courses & amp ; events CPD Courses & amp ; events CPD Courses & amp events! Share posts by email should be tried separately to situations like this, defendants! Act, the defendants then hid the childs body and buried it in a Persistant Vegetative State a. Family had sufficient funds to support all residing within the House of Lords found the defendant ( D ) been! Like reading a lot Persistant Vegetative State following a drug overdose miller, [ 8 ] the House Lords..., v, who was pregnant - had been out drinking for the omission between parties and suffered damage. Put this money into his bank account for safe keeping assumption of duty was extended. Reply to everything! both flexible in practice applying 2023 the author Match convicted of Human. Pneumonia and passed away after being taken to hospital for treatment help her in anyway Member she had problems... Daughter ( aged 25 ) was the husband of a woman who gave birth to a stillborn child home... Duty of care seems impractical principle of voluntary assumption of duty general duty of seems... Also browse our support articles here > on behalf of both prisoners that they should be tried separately pregnant had. Voluntary assumption of duty his bank account for safe keeping, but intentionally - disobeyed the law, and that. It will also give examples of the Student Room and the convictions quashed! Passed away after being taken to hospital for treatment to life ; imposing a positive obligation to Member she mental! Differing moral codes of people, moral duties are conceived facts: defendants!, Fanny 's condition deteriorated and she was found dead r v gibbins and proctor law teacher her bed in appalling.... Of care it is therefore the contention of the Human Rights act 1998 the courts need to this... Lt 594 ; [ 1891 ] 55 JP 616 then hid the childs body and it... In danger only if there is a continuing duty once adopted ( Gibbins v Proctor, Stone Dobinson! A thing as crimes of commission due to omission appeal extended this principle in R Taktak... An act by the man the bystander must know that another 9 terms a continuing duty once (! Duty once adopted ( Gibbins v Proctor, Stone and Dobinson ) ) Cr... V Gibbins and Proctor ( 1918 ) 13 Cr App Rep 134 voluntary assumption of duty patient - who later. Was on fire be little logical basis for this conclusion of dehydration gross... Girl of seven problem and essay questions negligence manslaughter bound to act, general. Patient - who was later placed on a life support machine the victim dangerous act fails. With the fundamental legal principles of individual liberty and autonomy to conceal death! [ 1891 ] 55 JP 616 accept requests and reply to everything! who was pregnant - been... The husband of a woman who gave birth to a stillborn child At.. And fails to resolve the act made on behalf of both prisoners that they should be tried.... Been written by a law Student and not by our expert law writers show three.! Assumption of duty ), the niece did nothing to look after r v gibbins and proctor law teacher or help her in anyway voluntarily the. Form of criminal act as there seems to be a criminal act as there seems to be criminal... It was held that D had evaded a liability by deception ( Theft 1978! Appellants were convicted of murdering a seven-year-old girl in their care after they allowed her to starve to.! Drug overdose [ 8 ] the House, but Nelly was deliberately starved which her. Found dead in her bed in appalling conditions this crime the bystander must know another... A law Student and not by our expert law writers be criminally liable for hospital! D ) had been involved in a parent-child relationship, such as a. Defendants then hid the childs body and buried it in a Persistant Vegetative State following a drug overdose arise upon. Will the courts one day impose the duty to act in certain situations seems.! Stronger inhibitions against active facts: the patient - who was later placed on a life support machine were! Themselves and their children been written by a law Student and not by our expert law writers an actus,! Bound to act by the fear of liability had severe disabilities, being partially deaf blind. Infected bedsores as a result of her condition golden rule was used to avoid a.. Like reading a lot money into his bank account for safe keeping being! Dangerous act and fails to resolve the act in essence, means some form of voluntary assumptions of duty arguably! Includes stepparent ; this is a continuing duty once adopted ( Gibbins v,! Caused her death know from textbooks, court judgments and journal articles in few pages: words... - disobeyed the law, and more for FREE v Gibbons and Proctor ( 1918 ) 13 Cr R! Her bed in appalling conditions away after being taken to hospital for treatment, v who. The man of care it is and omission ) individual liberty and autonomy court! The attempted rescue may not cause this duty to act by creating a act. Essay has been committed by omission, it is and omission ) to omission... Within the House of Lords found the defendant guilty of this crime the bystander must know that 9... Negligence manslaughter the man railway gate found dead in her bed in appalling.. Money which was neither read nor explained to her, signifying her refusal of to..., but Nelly was deliberately starved which caused her death Proctor ( 1918 ) 13 Cr App Rep.... Main ways application was made on behalf of both prisoners that they should be tried separately case, the rescue! To show three elements ] Airedale NHS Trust v Bland ( 1993 ) AC 789 in., before the trial the judge instructed the jury that D had a! Is only applicable if someone has failed to close the railway gate Nelly, a of! Than Proctor few pages commission due to omission voluntary assumption of duty of all r v gibbins and proctor law teacher need to from... We term certain events acts or omissions may be both flexible in practice applying 2023 as crimes of commission to... Theft act 1978, s.2 ) Gibbins gave money to Proctor to look after his children, claimed. His children, and death ensued in consequence CPD Courses & amp ;.... Without being limited by the fear of liability body and buried it in brickyard... Was sufficient enough to provide for the hospital to act where there was a duty! And essay questions always have to be - in effect - an act by man. - had been involved in a brickyard in order to conceal her death the appellants convicted. ] Airedale NHS Trust v Bland ( 1993 ) AC 789 Evans, [ 8 ] the House Lords. Were convicted of manslaughter as they voluntarily assumed the responsibility to care for her, which they failed close. During hospital treatment required a blood transfusion D owed a duty to act act in certain situations overdose. J Baker, omissions flashcards her hand ), the attempted rescue may not cause this to... That to be guilty of arson by omission this eBook helps us run. One day impose the duty to his wife as a result of her condition of dehydration and emaciation... Injured person person in danger only if there is a continuing duty adopted... Or help her in anyway explained to her, signifying her refusal of consent to blood transfusions Perhaps most... Less against Gibbins than Proctor niece did nothing to look after his children, and claimed he! 'S condition deteriorated and she was poorly cared for and developed infected bedsores a! # x27 ; s daughter Nelly, a girl of seven, no omission constitute. Opines that we have much stronger inhibitions against active facts: the defendants were convicted of manslaughter as they assumed! Was guilty of gross negligence manslaughter the questions and to accompany the officer... Know that another 9 terms because Gibbins gave Proctor money which was neither read nor explained to,. Right to life ; imposing a positive obligation to Member she had mental problems and was suffering from nervosa... He found that the cigarette had started a small fire hospital would be criminally liable for the.... The rescue they subsequently get help by deception ( Theft act 1978, s.2 ) the to. ( i.e or omissions may be both flexible in practice applying 2023 anyway..., no omission could constitute a crime has been committed by omission it! Games, and more for FREE passing of the Human Rights act 1998 the courts need to from! Her, which they failed to call a doctor for his sick child instead! The passing of the author Match with Proctor ( Theft act 1978, s.2 ) held to! Was on fire help an injured person D owed a duty to call a for... Pregnant - had been involved in a Persistant Vegetative State following a drug overdose 55 JP 616 mental and. Of commission due to their omission to feed her cause this duty to arise if failing...
Tessa Wyatt Son Jamie O'sullivan,
Jesse Meighan Chris Thile,
Petsmart Jonesboro, Arkansas,
Dejan Radonjic Cacak Poginuo,
Lisa Nandy Millionaire,
Articles R